CABI’s experts in the biological control of agricultural pests and diseases have conducted the first major study of potential biological controls that could be used in the fight against the devastating fall armyworm which recently arrived in Africa.
The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) attacks around 100 species of plant including rice, sorghum and sugarcane but favours maize. It has already started to cause substantial damage to staple crops grown by smallholder farmers in many parts of Africa.
According to a CABI evidence note, commissioned by the UK Department for International Development (DFID), crop losses from just 12 countries could be between $2.5 to $6.3 billion.
Many farmers in Africa are turning to pesticides to tackle the fall armyworm – as highlighted in the new paper ‘Assessment of potential biopesticide options for managing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Africa’ published in the Journal of Applied Entomology.
However, Dr Melanie Bateman, lead author of the research, says that while the ‘fall armyworm is an important and challenging pest management target in Africa’ safe, sustainable and effective interventions such as biopesticides are a ‘key component of management strategies’ to consider over chemical controls.
The assessment looked at 50 biopesticide active ingredients (AI) which have been registered in one or more of the 30 study countries for fall armyworm management. This includes 11 study countries in fall armyworm’s native range where farmers have been managing this pest for centuries and 19 in Africa where it is a new pest for farmers. Of these AI, 23 are recommended for further consideration and eight have been identified for short term action. These include:
- Neem and Bt products as well as several other AI that are registered within sub-Saharan Africa
- Sex pheromones and macrobials such as Trichogramma spp.-also highlighted as priority biopesticides to investigate further, although in some countries they do not need to be registered
- Spodoptera frugiperda nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) which so far is only registered outside sub-Saharan Africa
The study, funded by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)*, presents a number of recommended immediate short term and medium-term activities to move further research forward. For the short-term these include the possible fast-tracking of assessments for the registration of biopesticides (where they are not already) as well as reviewing and updating of extension materials to reflect the availability of suitable biopesticides. For the medium-term, the researchers suggest that governments could assist farmers by subsidising biopesticides (an approach Ghana is already adopting) or, where proven biopestide AIs are not locally available, consider opportunities for the local production of products – working in partnership with private sector companies.
Dr Melanie Bateman, Integrated Crop Management Advisor at CABI, said, ‘Some governments in Africa have given out insecticides to farmers, including some highly hazardous products.
‘However, the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations has developed a Framework for Partnership which emphasises alternatives to pesticides such as microbials and their extracts, botanicals, semiochemicals, inorganic biochemicals, predators and parasitoids.’
Dr Bateman states that many different national, regional and international research organisations, as well as biopesticide manufacturers themselves, have made the identification of low-risk management options for fall armyworm a high priority but that cost is an important factor.
Dr Bateman added, ‘While some farmers might be willing to pay a premium for a lower risk product, many smallholder maize farmers in Africa already have small margins so will seek to minimize the additional cost of controlling a new pest such as the fall armyworm.
‘If a significant market for a lower risk product can be developed, the price may fall. With that in mind, currently unaffordable products should not be automatically ruled out for further consideration.’
Notes to editors
Full paper reference:
Bateman, ML, Day, RK, Luke, B, Edgington, S, Kuhlmann, U, Cock, MJW, ‘Assessment of potential biopesticide options for managing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Africa,’ J Appl Entomol. 2018;00:1-15.
*Note on funding for the paper:
Funding was provided by the Global Project ‘Green Innovation Centres for the Agriculture and Food Sector’ implemented by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (BMZ). Additional, complementary data was collected with support from the Department for International Development, UK (DFID).
CABI has also published a synopsis of the paper: ‘Fall Armyworm: Potential biopesticides for the management of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Africa’, which can be read here.
Media contact: Wayne Coles, Communications Manager, CABI, email: email@example.com Tel: +44 (0) 1491 829395
Dr Roger Day, Programme Executive, Action on Invasives, CABI, email: firstname.lastname@example.org Tel: +254 20 2271000
For more information on CABI’s work on biocontrols visit: https://www.cabi.org/projects/controlling-invasive-species/biocontrol/
CABI is an international not-for-profit organization that improves people’s lives by providing information and applying scientific expertise to solve problems in agriculture and the environment.
Through knowledge sharing and science, CABI helps address issues of global concern such as improving global food security and safeguarding the environment. We do this by helping farmers grow more and lose less of what they produce, combating threats to agriculture and the environment from pests and diseases, protecting biodiversity from invasive species, and improving access to agricultural and environmental scientific knowledge. Our 49 member countries guide and influence our core areas of work, which include development and research projects, scientific publishing and microbial services.
We gratefully acknowledge the core financial support from our member countries (and lead agencies) including the United Kingdom (Department for International Development), China (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture), Australia (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research), Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Netherlands (Directorate-General for International Cooperation, and Switzerland (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation).